Write the composition requirement
Record each required fibre and proportion if known. Explain whether the percentages are fixed or a target range requiring a proposal. Leave unknown proportions blank. Separate a marketing direction such as wool-rich from a confirmed composition that can be carried into labelling or transaction documents.
Authorise alternatives explicitly
Identify which materials may be discussed as alternatives and which must remain unchanged. Ask the team to explain the reason for a proposed substitution and the properties it may affect. Record the alternative under a new revision. A supplier recommendation does not automatically amend the buyer’s original specification.
Prepare material documentation questions
If origin, recycled content or another sourcing requirement matters, state the documents required for the article and order. Ask which evidence is available and what product or transaction scope it covers. A general sustainability description does not prove the content of a particular fabric lot.
Compare samples under the same conditions
Use the garment’s intended handling and care route to review the proposed blend. Compare drape, surface, seam behaviour and pressing response using identified samples. Keep the test conditions and garment construction visible. Similar appearance in a photograph does not establish equivalent composition or performance.
Freeze the approved blend revision
Carry the confirmed composition, sample identity and finished properties together into the order record. List any remaining material-supply or documentation questions. A repeat order still needs a current supply and approval discussion. If a component changes, review whether new sampling, reporting or garment trials are required.
Resolve a blend request driven by a target price
If a buyer asks for a lower-cost blend, keep the garment requirements visible before changing the composition. State which fibres or percentages are mandatory and which may be proposed. Ask for alternatives with their own specifications and samples, rather than allowing the original article description to drift.
Compare the proposal’s finished weight, usable width, construction and finishing basis alongside price. A lower unit price may be associated with a different consumption or making result. Review the actual sample with the garment team and record why it is acceptable or why further development is needed.
Investigate performance without blaming one fibre
When a blend sample pills, feels too firm or changes dimension after the intended treatment, begin with the test or trial conditions and the sample’s identity. Ask whether the evidence applies to the proposed finished article. A fibre percentage does not isolate every variable in yarn, construction and finishing.
Keep a composition question separate from the performance question. Request composition evidence for a mandatory fibre claim and an agreed performance assessment for the garment requirement. Do not assume that changing one percentage will deliver a particular grade or eliminate a complaint without reviewing the revised fabric.
Illustrative comparison: the blend meets composition but not handle
Imagine a proposed sample meets the stated wool blend composition but feels firmer than the approved reference. Confirm that both samples are in comparable finished states and review bending, surface feel and drape separately. Document the difference with sample IDs.
Ask which development option might address the handle and whether it would affect weight, width or appearance. Keep the composition requirement unchanged unless the buyer authorises an alternative. This hypothetical example shows why a compliant composition result and an acceptable physical sample are separate pieces of evidence.
Prepare a blend specification that can be checked
Write the composition constraint and confirmation basis, not just a marketing blend name. Add the finished measurements, construction, finish reference, care requirement and relevant performance assessment. If recycled content is requested, identify the claim and documentation scope separately.
For a revised blend, compare the new specification line by line with the previous article and mark what changed. Transfer the accepted revision to the RFQ and order handover. Keep unsupported composition or certification wording out of garment labels and commercial documents until the responsible parties have confirmed the evidence.
Prepare the next decision
| Input | Decision to make | Record to keep |
|---|---|---|
| Fibre content | Exact percentages or open target | Composition requirement |
| Alternative | Buyer permission before substitution | Revised proposal |
| Documentation | Article and order scope | Evidence request |
| Sample | Comparable garment conditions | Trial record |
| Revision | One approved blend and sample identity | Order specification |
Questions for this stage
Can a blend target remain open at the first enquiry?
Yes. Explain the garment and preferred properties, then ask for a proposal. The final composition must be confirmed before it is treated as an order specification.
Does a soft handfeel prove wool content?
No. Handfeel and composition are separate properties. Use the confirmed specification and relevant documents for composition decisions.
Can a repeat order use a different component fibre?
Review the change explicitly. It can affect appearance, performance, documentation and price, so the revised basis needs approval.
Can the same wool percentage produce a different fabric?
Yes. Composition is only one attribute. Yarn, construction, finishing, weight and width still need article-specific confirmation and sample review.
Should recycled content be included in the ordinary blend percentage?
Describe both the fibre composition requirement and the intended recycled-content claim clearly. Request the documentation that supports the actual claim and order; a blend description alone does not establish recycled-content evidence.